Compare/Uptime Kuma vs UptimeRobot
Uptime checker (self-hosted) vs Uptime checker
Uptime Kuma vs UptimeRobot
Kuma is what you install when you do not want a SaaS bill. UptimeRobot is what you open when you do not want a Docker host. Both will ping HTTP. Only one is still up if your only server is the one that just died.
Side by side
| Topic | Uptime Kuma | UptimeRobot |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | People who already self-host, want many monitor types, and accept that the checker is another box they own. | Teams that want a lot of URL checks, keyword monitors, and a familiar status page without a sales call. |
| Not for | Founders who did not want another container, or who need a status URL that stays up when their VPS does not. | Anyone who needs browser transactions, APM, or a status page that can be overwritten when HTTP is lying. |
| Hosting | Self-hosted | Hosted |
| What it checks | HTTP, keyword, TCP, DNS, Docker, push/heartbeats, and more — depending on how you configure it. | HTTP(S), ping, port, keyword, and heartbeat checks. Free tier is 5-minute intervals. |
| Status page | You can expose a status page from the same instance. It lives where you deployed it. | Hosted public status pages, custom domains on paid plans. |
| Alerts | Huge list of notification backends if you configure them. | Email, SMS, Slack, Telegram, Discord, webhooks, and more. |
| Complexity | Simple software, operationally yours. | Simple |
| Pricing shape | Free software. You pay the VPS, the backups, and the time. | Free tier, then inexpensive paid plans as monitor count grows. |
What Uptime Kuma is
The open-source Docker monitor you run yourself. Free, flexible, and yours to keep online. People who already self-host, want many monitor types, and accept that the checker is another box they own. Founders who did not want another container, or who need a status URL that stays up when their VPS does not.
What UptimeRobot is
The default cheap HTTP monitor: many checks, a status page, and a free tier people actually use. Teams that want a lot of URL checks, keyword monitors, and a familiar status page without a sales call. Anyone who needs browser transactions, APM, or a status page that can be overwritten when HTTP is lying.
The actual split
Uptime Kuma is self-hosted. UptimeRobot is hosted. That is the first fork — who owns the checker when your own network is the thing on fire.
Who should pick which
- Uptime Kuma: People who already self-host, want many monitor types, and accept that the checker is another box they own.
- UptimeRobot: Teams that want a lot of URL checks, keyword monitors, and a familiar status page without a sales call.