Compare/Uptime Kuma vs Uptrends
Uptime checker (self-hosted) vs Synthetics / mid-market
Uptime Kuma vs Uptrends
Uptime Kuma The open-source Docker monitor you run yourself. Free, flexible, and yours to keep online. Uptrends Browser-level synthetics and API checks, including multi-step payments and OpenTelemetry export. Uptime Kuma is self-hosted. Uptrends is hosted. That is the first fork — who owns the checker when your own network is the thing on fire. If you only needed a public status page and a health check, neither may be the smallest tool — GreenCrew is built for that job.
Side by side
| Topic | Uptime Kuma | Uptrends |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | People who already self-host, want many monitor types, and accept that the checker is another box they own. | Teams that need to prove a user journey — not just a URL — from many regions, and maybe stream that into OTel. |
| Not for | Founders who did not want another container, or who need a status URL that stays up when their VPS does not. | A first monitor on a side project, or anyone who only wanted a public status URL. |
| Hosting | Self-hosted | Hosted |
| What it checks | HTTP, keyword, TCP, DNS, Docker, push/heartbeats, and more — depending on how you configure it. | Transaction monitoring in real browsers, API steps, extra confirmations that a payment actually landed. |
| Status page | You can expose a status page from the same instance. It lives where you deployed it. | Reporting and public dashboards; the product is the probe, not the customer page. |
| Alerts | Huge list of notification backends if you configure them. | Detailed synthetic failures, including which step broke. |
| Complexity | Simple software, operationally yours. | Moderate |
| Pricing shape | Free software. You pay the VPS, the backups, and the time. | Priced as synthetics, not as a free ping. Transactions cost more than availability. |
What Uptime Kuma is
The open-source Docker monitor you run yourself. Free, flexible, and yours to keep online. People who already self-host, want many monitor types, and accept that the checker is another box they own. Founders who did not want another container, or who need a status URL that stays up when their VPS does not.
What Uptrends is
Browser-level synthetics and API checks, including multi-step payments and OpenTelemetry export. Teams that need to prove a user journey — not just a URL — from many regions, and maybe stream that into OTel. A first monitor on a side project, or anyone who only wanted a public status URL.
The actual split
Uptime Kuma is self-hosted. Uptrends is hosted. That is the first fork — who owns the checker when your own network is the thing on fire.
Who should pick which
- Uptime Kuma: People who already self-host, want many monitor types, and accept that the checker is another box they own.
- Uptrends: Teams that need to prove a user journey — not just a URL — from many regions, and maybe stream that into OTel.